|
The Salt Lake (City) Tribune announced July 11, 2000 in an
article written by Stephen Hunt that in Farmington, Utah,
"Jurors found psychiatrist Robert Allen Weitzel guilty
Monday [July 10] of causing the deaths of five patients with
morphine overdoses, convicting him of two counts of manslaughter
and three counts of negligent homicide."
- (This article is available for a small $2.50 user fee from the
Archives of the Salt Lake Tribune.)
At least in this case, a local prosecutor had the strength of
conviction to stand up and defend the rights of future patients
as well as those of the patients who had died and enforce the
laws against killing, even by normally respected doctors.
An August 12, 1998 article (see footnote below) in the Journal
of the American Medical Association conclusively reports that
physician assisted suicide or hastening death is occurring and is
not "unheard of" or a "rare" occasion. This
report documents cases of physician assisted suicide.
In the above survey of 355 oncologists, "(15.8%) reported
participating in euthanasia or physician assisted suicide."
"Thirty-eight of 53 oncologists described clearly defined
cases of euthanasia or physician assisted suicide." In the
cases reported by that 15.8% of oncologists, "(60.5%) [of
the patients] both initiated and repeated their request for
euthanasia or physician assisted suicide, but 6 patients
(15.8%) did not participate in the decision for euthanasia or
physician assisted suicide. [emphasis added]
Thirty-seven patients (97.4%) were experiencing unremitting pain
or such poor physical functioning they could not perform
self-care."
Let's Do the Math!
What does it mean that 15.8% of the patients did not
participate in the decision for euthanasia or physician assisted
suicide? Isn't the obvious conclusion: these patients died
without having requested to be killed, without asking for their
death to be hastened.
The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization's
Fact sheet (located at: www.nhpco.org/facts.htm) reports that in
1998 there were approximately 540,000 hospice patients in the
U.S. and that 60% of hospice patients (in 1995) were patients who
had cancer. That is only a small portion of the terminally ill in
our nation, because hospice does not reach the majority of the
terminally ill. But if we use the smaller number of patients who
were enrolled in hospice and multiply that by 60%, we get
approximately 324,000 cancer patients in 1998 enrolled in
hospice.
If 15.8% of the oncologists who treated cancer in all of these
patients performed physician assisted suicide or euthanasia of
some sort, then that would equal 51,192 (.158 X 324,000=51,192).
Now we get to the interesting part for the prosecutors. The
survey said that 15.8% of the cases involving euthanasia were
done when the patients "did not participate in the decision
for euthanasia or physician assisted suicide." 15.8% of the
51,192 patients who may have experienced euthanasia would equal
approximately 8,088 patients throughout the US in one year who
may not have participated in the decision, but the doctors did it
anyway!
Of course, someone will argue that "you can't apply the
research statistics that way." ... or that "the number
of cases must be much smaller." Well, prosecutors, if the
number was even one tenth of that figure (which is conservative
by any imagination) there would still be approximately 809
patients who died at the hands of his or her physician without
participating in the decision. What is "not participating in
the decision to be killed" other than murder, plain and
simple?
If we divided the 809 patients by 50 states, there might be 16
patients killed every year in each state, but of course, each
state has a different percentage of the terminally ill
population. Can we safely assume that at least one or two
patients are murdered each year in each state of the USA?
Certainly. So prosecutors, when family members complain that
their loved one was killed by an overdose of morphine, don't
just write it off, the physicians admit to doing it! and in the
case before you, it may actually have happened!
Let's Calculate Involuntary Euthanasia Deaths
Based on Total Cancer Deaths Per Year
The American Cancer Society estimates that for the
year 2000, "about 552,200 Americans are expected to die of
cancer this year." If we use the percentage 15.8% (from the
JAMA research article noted above) to calculate the number of
cancer patients who receive euthanasia with or without the
patient's knowledge, we get 87,247.6 cases where oncologists
may have participated in euthanasia or physician assisted
suicide. Of the 87,247.6, the survey statistics showed that 15.8%
of those 15.8% of cancer deaths were without the knowledge of the
patient. (15.8% of 15.8% = 2.496%) 2.496% of total cancer deaths
equals 13,782.9 patients per year in the U.S.
That number divided by 50 equals an approximate number of 276
cancer patients per state (on average) who may be killed without
their knowledge by oncologists who believe they know better. With
these numbers, even if we hypothesize that only one-tenth of
those cases were actually without the knowledge of the patient,
that would still leave 27.6 patients in each state (on average)
who were killed (euthanized) without their knowledge. It should
be noted that the large majority of oncologists and physicians do
not perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide without the
patient's knowledge. But the point is that some physicians do
act independently of the patient's own wishes.
Non-Cancer Terminal Illnesses Increase the Number of
Euthanasia Cases
While the conservative estimates above only include euthanasia
deaths occurring in patients with cancer, there are many other
diseases and conditions where a patient may be euthanized. In the
case of Dr. Weitzel noted above, some of the patients had
Alzheimer's disease or dementia. It is reasonable to conclude
that euthanasia occurs when patients have diseases such as
congestive heart failure, kidney disease, AIDS, and simply old
age and depression. Research shows that doctors were willing to
order increased dosages of morphine even when the patient had no
pain, but simply was weak or depressed. (See HPA article on questionable
deaths). In even more sinister circumstances, a patient may
be euthanized in order to hasten the inheritance of large estates
or life insurance policy awards.
Criminal Prosecutions on Record for Hastening Death
For a discussion of the criminal prosecutions of some cases
involving the deaths of patients in health care situations,
please refer to the following article posted at the American
Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics website: "Criminal Act or Palliative Care? Prosecutions
Involving the Care of the Dying" by Ann Alpers, JD. Ann
Alpers is a professor at the University of California at San
Francisco's School of Medicine and has taught Medical
Bioethics, among other topics.
Need to File Complaints to Board of Medicine,
Board of Nursing and Find Plaintiffs' Attorney for Legal
Advice
One important point to remember if you want to stop the
medical killings: you will need to send a detailed complaint to
the State Board of
Medicine as soon as possible, because in some cases, the DEA
will wait to see the findings of the State Board of Medicine. You
can also file a complaint to the State Board of Nursing if a nurse was involved
in administering a fatal dose of narcotic. It is wise to consult
a medical malpractice attorney before filing your complaint to
the Board of Medicine and it is also important to get a medical review by an
independent physician.
If you wish to stop the involuntary euthanasias (medical
killings of patients), you will need to get a copy of the medical
record for an independent medical review of your loved one's
case. Your attorney can assist you in that, because most hospices
will fight tooth and nail to never give you the medical records
if something truly terrible happened. If you don't have or
know of a medical malpractice attorney in your area, you can search for a
plaintiffs' attorney.
It is very important that you try to find an attorney who
files claims as a plaintiffs' attorney to represent you. If
you get an attorney who handles medical malpractice, but
regularly represents the corporations, you may not get the legal
representative you deserve! Hospices have been known to falsify
documentation, delete information, send incomplete records, stall
and many other tactics that infuriate the families of the
victims. A plaintiff's attorney will be able to successfully
overcome the obstacles that hospice corporations routinely throw
in the way of families seeking the truth (and a full, accurate
copy of the medical record).
Taking the step by step approach to achieving justice will
help make it more likely that the truly egregious violations of
standards of care are noted (some you may miss, not being a
physician) and corrected through the government justice
departments and local district attorney's office. Having a
medical malpractice attorney help you will assure that the
complaint to the Board of Medicine and Board of Nursing is
written in such a way that the allegations are not capable of
being misunderstood or brushed aside.
Footnotes:
A summary of the JAMA article is listed at: The practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted
suicide in the United States. [For complete article see JAMA and search
from the JAMA site for the following article: 1998 Aug
12;280(6):507-13 entitled "The practice of euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide in the United States: adherence to
proposed safeguards and effects on physicians." written by
Emanuel EJ, Daniels ER, Fairclough DL, Clarridge BR done at the
Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Division of Cancer
Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,
Mass 02115, USA.]
The Hospice Patients Alliance provides information in the spirit
of consumer advocacy, believing that informed consumers of
healthcare are best able to protect their rights and obtain
quality hospice care. If you have questions about the legality of
certain health care interventions and are seeking legal or
medical advice, we strongly encourage you to consult with a
competent and experienced attorney or physician. In order to
obtain completely objective and un-"politicized"
advice, you may need to consult with an attorney or physician who
is not located in the same area as the hospice or physician
involved.
|