JAMA Right-to-Die Piece Was a Fake
By N. Gregory Hamilton, M.D.
September 26, 2001
"A Journal of the American Medical Association article promoting death for
"uselessness" (Shah, 2000, p.1897) was simply not true. Dr. Michael
Swenson put it succinctly: "the events described in his story never happened"
(Swenson, 2001). Swenson supervised Dr. Shetal Shah, author of the
deceptive medical journal article, in his work as a visiting medical student
in Gambell, Alaska. The supervisor and the medical journal editor did the right
thing. They corrected the record. They told the truth. Shah, however,
persisted in his self-justification, claiming that what he presented as fact
could
have happened.
True to the tradition of a long line of liars in the right-to-die movement,
Shetal
Shah, M.D., presented as fact his fantasy about what death could be like in
the
arctic. He spun a yarn that a Siberian Yupik elder presented at a remote
village clinic with the chief complaint of "uselessness." Shah then proceeded
with a rambling, romanticized saga of events that never happened. At the end
of the story, the elder, rather predictably, stepped out onto the frozen
Arctic
Ocean and walked to his death.
In presenting this story, Shah imposed a harsh, utilitarian ethic on the Yupik
culture, which has no such ethic. He claimed, "When a man feels his ability
to
help the tribe has expired, he ... bids farewell to his family and walks over
the
frozen Arctic Ocean, never to return" (Shah, 2000, p. 1897). He described a
culture "that feels a man is only as valuable as the wisdom he imparts" (p.
1898). As Dr. Swenson, who actually knows something about the people with
whom he works, pointed out, Shah's claim "perpetrates a falsehood that has
never been true among the Inuit of Alaska" (Swenson, 2001, p. 919). As in all
Inuit cultures, elders among the Siberian Yupik are held in "very high
esteem,"
because they are "intrinsically valued," "just because they are the elders"
(p.
919).
In his zeal, Shah imposed the utilitarian values of the modern bioethics
movement (Smith, 2001) upon this fictional character from a different
culture.
Shah claimed the non-existent tradition of self-extinction is based "solely on
utility" (p. 1897). The problem is that there is no such tradition, as
Swenson
could have taught him. The falsehood that the Inuit ever had such a tradition
is apparently based on a western misunderstanding arising from a form of
nineteenth century social Darwinism. By perpetrating a new version of this
myth, this time in the name of twenty-first century utilitarianism, Shah
devalues not only the Inuit culture, but all individuals who may be vulnerable
and dependent (Hamilton, N.G. et al., 1998). He apparently did so in an
attempt to extend a "right to die" to anyone who feels demeaned by their
culture, as well as to "chronic, progressively ill, or the elderly ICU
patient with
a poor prognosis" (Shah, 2000, p. 1897). These later patients Shah himself
demeaned by claiming they have illnesses we doctors "would rather not live
with" (Shah, p. 1897). Shah's solution appears to be a duty to die.
Shah's is merely one in a long line of right-to-die deceptions. Patti Rosen,
for
example, claimed in a television commercial key to passing the Oregon
assisted-suicide law that her daughter took her assisted-suicide pills and
slipped "peacefully away." Only when it was too late was the truth finally
revealed to the public. Rita Marker of the International Anti-Euthanasia Task
Force had tried to make these facts known earlier. The pills initiated a
dying
process so gruesome that "a family member nearly put a pillow over her
daughter's head" to smother her (O'Keefe, 1997). "In the end, Rosen, a
registered nurse, said she 'hit a vein,' suggesting she had to use an
injection to
end her daughter's life."
Only after a decade long killing spree was it
finally revealed that 75% of Kevorkian's victims were not even terminally ill
(Roscoe, 2000). More subtly deceptive is the Oregon Health Division (OHD)
practice of using as their sole source of data the stories of the
assisted-suicide doctors themselves (see PCC News, Spring 2001). OHD treats those
complicit in the suicides as if they could be counted on to tell the truth,
the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. OHD persists in overlooking serious,
unreported problems with assisted suicide in Oregon. There have been
documented depressed individuals (Hamilton & Hamilton, 1998) and those
pressured by family members receiving lethal overdoses, doctor shopping, and
grotesque failed assisted-suicide attempts not reported by the suicide doctors
or OHD (Hamilton, C., 2000).
The JAMA editor acknowledged that a hoax had been perpetrated. Now, it's
time to recognize a larger pattern of deception: the claim of a "right to
die" is based on demeaning and dehumanizing fantasies of a few individuals who
consider some other people's lives useless.
References
Shah, S. (2000). Five miles from tomorrow. Journal of the American
Medical Association 284:1897-1898.
Swenson, M.D. (2001). A story about suicide in the arctic. Journal of the
American Medical Association 286:919.
Hamilton, C. (2000). The Oregon report: What's hiding behind the numbers?
PCC News 3:2-4.
Hamilton, N.G. et al. (1998). The doctor-patient relationship and assisted
suicide: a contribution from dynamic psychiatry. American Journal of
Forensic Psychiatry 19:59-75.
Hamilton, N.G. and Hamilton, C.A.(1999). Therapeutic response to assisted
suicide request. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 63:191-201.
O'Keefe, M. (1997). Husband's revelation illuminates suicide's dark side.
Oregonian, June 29, 1997.
Roscoe, L.A., Dragovic, L.J., and Cohen, D. (2000). Dr. Jack Kevorkian and
cases of euthanasia in Oakland County, Michigan, 1990-1998. New
England Journal of Medicine 343:1735-1736.
Smith, W. (2001). Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in
America. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Back to Top of Page
Hospice Patients Alliance affirms that all human life is inherently valuable and that the role of hospice nurses, physicians and all other staff is to alleviate suffering and provide comfort for the sick and dying without sanctioning or assisting their suicide. A death with dignity allows for a natural death in its own time, while doing everything possible to assure relief from distressing symptoms.
Sign up for the Hospice-Issues Online Email Discussion Group
at Hospice Patients Alliance
http://lists.hospicepatients.org/mailman/listinfo/hospice-issues
Click on the Hospice Issues link above and then you can sign up to join the discussion of issues in hospice and end of life care, and you will begin to receive email messages from the members of the discussion group. All you need to do is enter your email address, along with your own password, and click the "Subscribe" button.
|